Decision guide
Verdict or Talent Validation. Which do you need?
If you just want the standalone Analysis AI, Verdict is enough. If you want the full hiring process — from scorecard to post-hire drift detection — go with Talent Validation. Here's the clear difference.
Dimension-by-dimension comparison
| Dimension | Verdict standalone | Talent Validation |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | The Analysis AI tool — head-to-head + ranking + promote, with scoring | Full cockpit — calibration, evidence map, Analysis, recommendation, post-hire tracking |
| Role calibration | Paste the JD per Analysis | Persistent scorecard with 6 dimensions, signed pre-interview |
| Evidence map | Not included | AI extracts CV evidence per dimension |
| Analysis format | Compare two + ranking + promote | Same engine, integrated into the flow |
| Recommendation report | Per-Analysis PDF only | Synthesized recommendation across Analyses + evidence |
| Post-hire tracking | Not included | Week-4 / Week-10 / 30-60-90 checkpoints + drift detection |
| Pricing | $9.99–$399.99 credit packs | Subscription per role / engagement |
| Best for | Recruiters running ad-hoc comparisons; teams without a full hiring process | Hiring managers running roles with sponsor approval + post-hire accountability |
What you get
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Role calibration
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Evidence map
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Analysis format
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Recommendation report
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Post-hire tracking
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Pricing
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation
Best for
Verdict standalone
Talent Validation